Blank Da 2166 9 1 PDF Form

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to evaluate Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation helps assess their performance and potential for future assignments. It serves as a formal record that contributes to personnel decisions within the Army.

Who needs to fill out the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form must be completed by the rated NCO, their rater, and the senior rater. Each individual plays a crucial role in providing an accurate assessment of the NCO's performance and potential. The rater is typically the direct supervisor, while the senior rater is usually one level higher in the chain of command.

What information is required in Part I of the form?

Part I collects administrative data, including the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, date of rank, unit information, and the period covered by the evaluation. This section ensures that all relevant details are accurately recorded for proper identification and processing.

How does the evaluation process work?

The evaluation process begins with the rater assessing the NCO's performance based on specific criteria. The rater then discusses these assessments with the NCO. After this discussion, the senior rater reviews the evaluation and provides their own assessment. The NCO has the opportunity to acknowledge the evaluation, but their signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the content.

What are the key areas evaluated in Part IV?

Part IV evaluates several key areas, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area requires the rater to determine whether the NCO met the standard and to provide comments that support their assessment. This comprehensive evaluation helps in understanding the NCO's overall performance.

What happens if an NCO disagrees with their evaluation?

If an NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they can utilize the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. This process allows the NCO to formally challenge aspects of the evaluation they believe are inaccurate or unfair. It is important for the NCO to be aware of this process and to act within the specified timeframes.

How often should the DA 2166 9 1 form be submitted?

The DA 2166 9 1 form should be submitted for each evaluation period, which typically occurs annually or when an NCO changes assignments. Regular evaluations ensure that performance is consistently monitored and that NCOs receive timely feedback on their development and potential.

1. Not including all required personal information in Part I, such as name, SSN, and rank. This can delay processing.

2. Failing to double-check dates for accuracy, especially the date of rank and the period covered. Incorrect dates can lead to confusion.

3. Leaving out the rated NCO's email address. This is essential for communication and verification purposes.

4. Not signing or dating the form where required. Signatures in Part II are crucial for validation.

5. Using an incorrect format for dates, such as not following the YYYYMMDD format. This can cause errors in documentation.

6. Omitting comments in performance evaluations. Providing detailed feedback is important for clarity and future reference.

7. Not specifying areas of special emphasis in the duty description. This information helps clarify expectations.

8. Failing to complete the APFT section accurately, especially if the NCO did not meet standards. Comments are required in these cases.

9. Not reviewing the entire form before submission. A thorough review can catch mistakes that may have been overlooked.

10. Submitting the form without ensuring that all attachments are included. Missing documents can lead to delays in processing.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential tool for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it often goes hand-in-hand with several other important forms and documents that help provide a comprehensive view of an NCO's service and achievements. Below is a list of these forms, each playing a unique role in the evaluation process.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the NCO Evaluation Report for SSG and above. It complements the DA Form 2166-9-1 by providing a more detailed evaluation for higher-ranking NCOs, ensuring that their performance is assessed appropriately.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document captures counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It is vital for documenting performance issues, setting goals, and tracking progress over time.
• DA Form 1059: This form is used to document the completion of military schools and courses. It highlights an NCO's professional development and educational achievements, which are important factors in evaluations.
• DA Form 67-10-1: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for company grade officers. While it is focused on officers, it may be referenced in conjunction with NCO evaluations to provide context regarding leadership and teamwork.
• DA Form 4187: The Personnel Action Form is used for a variety of administrative purposes, including requests for reassignments or promotions. It can influence an NCO's evaluation by documenting changes in status or responsibilities.
• DA Form 750: The Army's Performance Appraisal System (PAS) form is used for documenting performance evaluations of civilian employees. It can be useful in understanding the broader context of performance assessments across the Army.
• DA Form 3349: This is the Physical Profile Form. It documents an individual’s physical limitations and is crucial for ensuring that NCOs meet the Army's physical fitness standards, which are a key component of performance evaluations.

Each of these forms contributes to a well-rounded understanding of an NCO's capabilities and accomplishments. By using them in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1, leaders can ensure that evaluations are fair, thorough, and reflective of an NCO's true potential.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms serve similar purposes in assessing performance, potential, and qualifications in various contexts. Here are four documents that share similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1:

• DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) used for evaluating commissioned officers. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it includes sections for administrative data, performance evaluation, and overall potential. Both forms emphasize the importance of feedback and provide a structured format for assessing an individual's capabilities and contributions.
• DA Form 4856: The Developmental Counseling Form is utilized for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, it focuses on performance and professional development, allowing leaders to provide constructive feedback and set goals for improvement.
• DA Form 1059: This form is used for recording academic evaluations from Army schools and training programs. It parallels the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that it assesses the individual's performance and potential, providing a formal record of accomplishments and areas for growth.
• DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the NCO Evaluation Report for higher ranks, specifically for the ranks of Staff Sergeant and above. It shares the same structure and purpose as the DA Form 2166-9-1, focusing on evaluating leadership abilities, competencies, and overall performance in a military context.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it's important to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are seven things you should and shouldn't do:

• Do double-check all personal information, including name and SSN, for accuracy.
• Don't leave any sections blank; fill out every required field.
• Do use the correct format for dates, specifically YYYYMMDD.
• Don't forget to include the rated NCO's email address in the appropriate section.
• Do ensure that all signatures are obtained before submission.
• Don't ignore the comments section; provide detailed feedback where required.
• Do review the entire form for completeness before submitting it.

Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form can be challenging due to various misconceptions. Here are some common misunderstandings and clarifications regarding this evaluation report:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for senior NCOs.

This form is specifically designed for evaluating Sergeants (SGTs) and is not limited to higher-ranking personnel.

• Misconception 2: The signature of the rated NCO indicates agreement with the evaluation.

The rated NCO's signature merely confirms that the administrative data is correct and that they have seen the report, not that they agree with the assessments.

• Misconception 3: The form does not require any attachments.

Depending on the situation, additional documentation may be necessary to support the evaluation, as indicated by the number of enclosures.

• Misconception 4: Only the rater completes the evaluation.

Both the rater and the senior rater play significant roles in completing the evaluation, and their input is essential.

• Misconception 5: The form is only for performance evaluation.

While performance evaluation is a key component, the form also includes sections for duty description and other administrative data.

• Misconception 6: The evaluation process is informal.

The evaluation process is structured and follows specific guidelines outlined in Army regulations.

• Misconception 7: The rated NCO cannot appeal the evaluation.

The rated NCO has the right to understand the appeals process as outlined in the regulations, allowing for recourse if they disagree with the evaluation.

• Misconception 8: Height and weight standards are optional.

Height and weight entries are mandatory and must be included in the evaluation to ensure compliance with Army standards.

• Misconception 9: The form is outdated and not relevant.

The DA 2166 9 1 form is regularly updated to reflect current evaluation standards and practices, making it a relevant tool for assessments.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs). Understanding how to fill it out and use it effectively is crucial for both raters and rated NCOs. Here are some key takeaways regarding this form:

• Accurate Information: Ensure that all personal details, such as name, SSN, and rank, are correctly filled in Part I. This information is essential for identification and record-keeping.
• Submission Reasons: Clearly indicate the reason for submission in Part I. This helps in categorizing the evaluation appropriately.
• Rating Period: Specify the period covered by the evaluation accurately. This includes start and end dates, which are critical for performance assessment.
• Rater and Senior Rater Details: Provide complete information for both the rater and senior rater, including names, signatures, and contact details. This ensures accountability and traceability.
• Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, the rater must assess various attributes like character, presence, and leadership. Clear comments should accompany ratings to justify evaluations.
• Counseling Dates: Record counseling dates accurately. This reflects the ongoing development and communication between the rater and the rated NCO.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature confirms that they have seen the report and understand the content. It does not imply agreement with the evaluations.
• Potential Assessment: In Part V, the senior rater must evaluate the rated NCO's potential compared to peers. This assessment is crucial for future assignments and career progression.
• Supplementary Review: If applicable, include a supplementary reviewer. This adds an additional layer of oversight to the evaluation process.

Completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 accurately and thoughtfully is essential for effective personnel management within the military. Each section serves a specific purpose and contributes to the overall assessment of an NCO's performance and potential.